Brainiac “Fraud” “Slammed” Within the Evening Normal And The Unbiased
And some of you have got been quoted. Good. If any of you are here from the Evening Normal in search of extra on the Brainiac faux experiments nonsense then click on right here (or, er, buy the Guardian):
www.badscience.web/ cat=fifty eight
There’s lots of different quackbusting motion on the location, listed by subject down the suitable hand aspect of the web page, and there’s rather more on the Brainiac faux experiments factor in tomorrow’s Unhealthy Science column which I’ll publish as soon as it goes dwell on the Guardian website.
Anyway, here’s the Night Commonplace article for those who missed it. It had an image of the exploding bath, Richard Hammond, and the wire going in to set off the plastic explosives…
Sky’s ‘fraud’ blown out of water
By Alex Baracaia, Night Customary
28 July 2006
A Tv science programme stands accused of faking experiments to make them more exciting.
Brainiac, the award-profitable Sky One collection fronted by Richard Hammond of BBC2’s High Gear, faces criticism from scientists who say its makers walking dead negan shirts turn to particular results when their experiments do not work.
In one episode the show defined how a full walking dead negan shirts bath tub would explode when volatile metals rubidium and caesium have been dropped into the water.
It’s claimed that when the experiment did not have the specified effect, producers merely rigged the tub with dynamite. While Hammond talks viewers by means of the process as whether it is for real, close inspection reveals a wire leading out of the bath.
Ben Goldacre, a neuroscientist and founding father of webpage badscience.internet, claims the show habitually fakes its outcomes and justifies the pretence by claiming it’s “entertainment”. He mentioned: “Some scientists and teachers have been saying for some time that Brainiac might fake experiments. But I don’t assume it even occurs to most individuals. It definitely didn’t happen to me at first.”
A Sky spokeswoman said: “Brainiac is an leisure show and the emphasis is on having fun.
“However, all of the experiments have confirmed theory behind them.We’re recognized for our love of huge explosions, our fans love them and after we add slightly one thing to create a bigger bang everyone seems to be in on the joke.”
However Dr Goldacre mentioned: “Sky saying they’re showing what ‘should’ occur is just bizarre. That’s not what science is about.” He mentioned he had requested Sky to verify the authenticity of other Brainiac experimentsbut the broadcaster had refused.
The Sunday evening show, launched in 2003, has been hailed for making science in style with kids. It not too long ago received a Royal Tv Society award. Past features embody testing if a cell phone can ignite petrol vapours, examining effects of electric shocks, and blowing up caravans.
On the badscience.web discussion board, one posting reads: “If they’re making cartoons of experiments they needs to be clearly marked as cartoons.”
Another says: “It’s not adequate to assert, ‘It’s Tv, moron, don’t take it seriously.’”
It’s in the Unbiased at present as effectively. I do find it slightly strange how newspapers don’t want to say that I did this story for the Guardian (who I really like): so the “Bad Science Website” is also quoted within the Impartial as the supply. The humorous factor is, I mean, I realise this isn’t the most exciting story in the world that anyone would wish to spend lots of time researching, but they only lifted a couple of quotes, and if they’d emailed me I could have given plenty more examples and damning background. Ho hum. Only attempting to assist.
Sky admits its science present faked explosions
By Cahal Milmo
29 July 2006
To viewers of the science programme Brainiac, the exploding bath seemed spectacular proof of the potency of what the presenter described as “the two dog’s nuts of the periodic table”.
Actually the blast was not the results of a gathering between water and rubidium and caesium, however the triggering of a bomb, Sky tv confirmed yesterday.
The artifice was spotted by Dr Ben Goldacre, who runs the Bad Science webpage dedicated to exposing pseudo-science.
The programme promises viewers that the experiments on the show – starting from blowing up caravans with completely different walking dead negan shirts gases to seeing if a mobile phone ignites petrol vapours – arebased on proved science.
However in a 2004 episode, the producers compromised. Explaining what occurred when the metals were put within the bath, a crew member said: “Absolutely bloody nothing. The density of caesium ensured it hit the bottom of the bath like a lead weight. The amount of water then drowned out the thermal shock. They could not go dwelling empty-handed. In order that they rigged a bomb in the underside of the bath.”
Sky said its viewers would remember when the results of any experiment had been exaggerated. These responsible had been longer part of the production group.